<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Transparent Agenda &#187; Untitled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transparentagenda.com/tag/untitled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transparentagenda.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:56:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Library of Congress on Flickr?</title>
		<link>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/09/21/the-library-of-congress-on-flickr/</link>
		<comments>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/09/21/the-library-of-congress-on-flickr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gfurry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library of Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Untitled]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transparentagenda.com/2008/09/21/the-library-of-congress-on-flickr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes they are. Looks like some interesting photos posted. Check it out here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes they are. Looks like some interesting photos posted. Check it out <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/" target="_blank">here</a></p>
<p>
<img src="http://transparentagenda.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/2868005065-5cb785d46a.jpg" width="436" height="317" alt="2868005065_5cb785d46a.jpg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/09/21/the-library-of-congress-on-flickr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mini Clubman ad</title>
		<link>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/09/09/mini-clubman-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/09/09/mini-clubman-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gfurry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Untitled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transparentagenda.com/2008/09/09/mini-clubman-ad/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mini is almost the only company selling cars these days. Here is an interesting ad that is starting to generate some buzz]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mini is almost the only company <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/03/by-the-numbers-august-2008-new-digs-edition/">selling cars</a> these days. Here is an interesting ad that is starting to generate some buzz <img src='http://transparentagenda.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HeHpHpj97P0&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HeHpHpj97P0&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344" /><br />
</object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/09/09/mini-clubman-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D90 vs Canon 50D the launch</title>
		<link>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/08/27/nikon-d90-vs-canon-50d-the-launch/</link>
		<comments>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/08/27/nikon-d90-vs-canon-50d-the-launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gfurry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon 50D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Untitled]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transparentagenda.com/2008/08/27/nikon-d90-vs-canon-50d-the-launch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday it was the Canon 50D, today Nikon fires back with the D90. Nikon bias aside I have to say Nikon blew Canon away on this release. I am not even talking about cameras here. Yesterday Canon fired off a press release and updated their website. Nothing special, just another page on the site along [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday it was the <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&amp;fcategoryid=139&amp;modelid=17499#ModelDetailAct" target="_blank">Canon 50D</a>, today Nikon fires back with the <a href="http://chsvimg.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/d90/en/" target="_blank">D90</a>. Nikon bias aside I have to say Nikon blew Canon away on this release. I am not even talking about cameras here. Yesterday Canon fired off a press release and updated their <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&amp;fcategoryid=139&amp;modelid=17499#ModelDetailAct" target="_blank">website</a>. Nothing special, just another page on the site along with 50 other cameras. To dilute the message even further on the same day they also introduced a few really boring point and shoot cameras that were barley worth mentioning. Nikon has all kinds of info including a <a href="http://www.chasejarvisandfriends.com/" target="_blank">cool video</a> from pro photographer <a href="http://www.chasejarvis.com/" target="_blank">Chase Jarvis</a> as well as pages and pages worth of data, sample pix and videos. Nice job Nikon.</p>
<p>Both cameras look great if you are in the market for a medium end DSLR. One word of advice, don&#8217;t listen to me. Go get your hands on any camera you are thinking about buying and try it out. If you stick with Nikon or Canon you really can&#8217;t go wrong.</p>
<div style="text-align: center;">
  <img src="http://transparentagenda.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/d50.jpg" width="436" height="232" alt="d50.jpg" /> <img src="http://transparentagenda.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/d90.jpg" width="436" height="194" alt="d90.jpg" />
</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
  If you want to find out more about the D90 check out the review at <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/previews/nikond90/">DPReview</a> or the 50D also at <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/previews/canoneos50d/">DPReview</a>
</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
  The is also a nice side by side caparison at <a href="http://www.digitalreview.ca/content/Nikon-D90-D80-D300-Canon-50D-Compared.shtml#D90_50D" target="_blank">digitalreview.ca</a>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/08/27/nikon-d90-vs-canon-50d-the-launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another week another new camera?</title>
		<link>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/07/21/another-week-another-new-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/07/21/another-week-another-new-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gfurry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canong9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix DMC-LX3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Untitled]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transparentagenda.com/2008/07/21/another-week-another-new-camera/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week Nikon introduced the D700. I am still waiting to see some real reviews before deciding to make the jump to the new model. This week Panasonic announced the Lumix DMC-LX3 to compete with the Canon G9 and possibly the Coolpix 6000 should it actually be anything more than a rumor. What do I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Last week Nikon introduced the <a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Product/Digital-SLR/25444/D700.html">D700</a>. I am still waiting to see some real reviews before deciding to make the jump to the new model. This week Panasonic announced the Lumix DMC-LX3 to compete with the <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&amp;fcategoryid=144&amp;modelid=15669">Canon G9</a> and possibly the <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/01/nikon-coolpix-p600.aspx">Coolpix 6000</a> should it actually be anything more than a rumor. What do I like about the new Panasonic? Well here is the short list. For all the details head over <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08072102panasoniclx3.asp">DPreview</a> for a great description along with a few hi-res product shots.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://transparentagenda.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/picture-186.jpg" width="438" height="261" alt="Picture 186.png" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Why would I be looking at a new camera when I am still happy with my G9? First on the list is size. I love my Canon G9 as a great take everywhere camera but it is still a brick. Here is a quick size comparison I did over at <a href="http://www.sizeasy.com/page/size_comparison/15236-canon-g9-vs-Panasonic-DMC-LX3">sizeasy.com.</a> Looks like the DMC-LX3 is considerably smaller than the G9 and much more pocketable Dimensions 108.7 x 59.5 x 27.1 mm Weight (with battery) 265 g</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://transparentagenda.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/15236-canon-g9-vs-panasonic-dmc-lx3.jpg" width="351" height="480" alt="15236-canon-g9-vs-Panasonic-DMC-LX3.jpg" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;">Next up is the wide angled bright lens. Shoots Wide (35mm Equiv.: 24-60mm) at• F2.0 &#8211; F8.0 The LX3 captures approx.213% larger viewing space compared to that of a normal 35mm camera, and even approx.136% larger compared to what a 28mm wide-angle lens can do. The G9 is 35-210mm f/2.8-4.8. The F2.0 lens on the LX-3 is about twice as bright as the F2.8 lens.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The LX-3 Boldly defies the trend to cram in the most pixels possible, Panasonic limited the LX3&#8242;s large 1/1.63-inch CCD to 10.1 megapixels. This made it possible to make each pixel around 45% larger than those in ordinary 10-megapixel cameras. As a result, both sensitivity and saturation is around 40% higher than in ordinary models, giving the LX3 exquisite image quality with both excellent sensitivity and a wide dynamic range.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">And finally upon initial inspection along with shooting RAW (as must) the LX-3 captures dynamic HD video in 1280 x 720p at a smooth 24 fps, in addition to WVGA (848 x 480) and normal VGA (640 x 480) using QuickTime Motion JPEG instead of the crappy AVI of the Canon.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The down sides seem to be a short zoom lens and no immediate time lapse feature which I have fun with my G9. Oh yeah and the fact that it has a ridiculous name. Canon G9, now that is a good camera name. LX-3 isn&#8217;t bad but Lumix! Come on. I know it is Lumix like luminance but I can&#8217;t help thinking of Lumicks every time I look at it. Which in my made up world is a big clumsy dumb guy. Maybe it is just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/07/21/another-week-another-new-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google directions with street view</title>
		<link>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/04/30/google-directions-with-street-view/</link>
		<comments>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/04/30/google-directions-with-street-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gfurry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Untitled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transparentagenda.com/2008/04/30/google-directions-with-street-view/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kind of cool. Not sure how useful. linked from googlemaps mania]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of cool. Not sure how useful.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dgJSXrkwshg&amp;hl=en" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dgJSXrkwshg&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355" /><br />
</object> linked from <a href="http://googlemapsmania.blogspot.com/2008/04/driving-directions-with-street-view-on.html" target="_blank">googlemaps mania</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transparentagenda.com/2008/04/30/google-directions-with-street-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

