<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Transparent Agenda &#187; december</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transparentagenda.com/tag/december/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transparentagenda.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:56:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>December Auto sales &#8211; Ouch!</title>
		<link>http://transparentagenda.com/2009/01/05/december-auto-sales-ouch/</link>
		<comments>http://transparentagenda.com/2009/01/05/december-auto-sales-ouch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gfurry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[december]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transparentagenda.com/2009/01/05/december-auto-sales-ouch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The numbers weren&#8217;t expected to be good and they lived up to expectations. Take Chrysler out of the mix and the big 3 don&#8217;t look that bad compared to their foreign competition. GM -31.4%Ford -32.4%Chrysler -53% Toyota -36.7%Honda -34.7%Nissan -30.1% Mercedes -32.1%BMW -35.9% See all the details at Autoblog.com UPDATE The yearly numbers they are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">The numbers weren&#8217;t expected to be good and they lived up to expectations. Take Chrysler out of the mix and the big 3 don&#8217;t look that bad compared to their foreign competition. </p>
<p style="clear: both">GM -31.4%<br />Ford -32.4%<br />Chrysler -53%</p>
<p style="clear: both">Toyota -36.7%<br />Honda -34.7%<br />Nissan -30.1%</p>
<p style="clear: both">Mercedes -32.1%<br />BMW -35.9%</p>
<p style="clear: both"><a href="http://transparentagenda.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/car-crash.jpg" class="image-link"><img class="linked-to-original" src="http://transparentagenda.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/car-crash1.jpg" height="260" width="370" style=" text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 10px;" /></a>See all the details at <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/05/by-the-numbers-december-2008-i-want-my-mommy-edition/" target="_blank">Autoblog.com</a><u><br /></u></p>
<p style="clear: both"><strong>UPDATE The yearly numbers they are not pretty either unless you like <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/05/by-the-numbers-2008-phew-glad-thats-over-edition/" target="_blank">red</a></strong></p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transparentagenda.com/2009/01/05/december-auto-sales-ouch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

